<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>hindes</title>
    <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/</link>
    <description>hindes</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:05:01 PDT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>http://www.blogdrive.com</generator>
    <copyright>Copyright 2008.</copyright>
    <category>Spirituality</category>
    <category>Occult</category>
    <category>Alternative Medicine</category>
    <item>
      <title>Eric P. Wijnants: serial plagiarist</title>
      <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/archive/43.html</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Reposted from my personal blog (Daniel Hindes' Blog) 
Once upon a time I came across a site that annoyed me. It had a wealth of material on esoteric subjects, details that were available nowhere else on the web, and in some cases nowhere else at all. The only problem was that not one piece of it had any citations, and that made it essentially useless for my purposes. It is standard scholarly practice if you are talking about something that happened 300 years ago to describe the sources upon which you base your conclusions. Other scholars such as myself can then go back to the sources and... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/comments?id=43</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Things I wrote in '07</title>
      <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/archive/42.html</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:40:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <description> 2007 was a  good year, and I wrote a number of interesting product reviews. 
A recent  article I wrote was a list of lens bargains for the Sony Alpha (formerly  Minolta Maxxum) lens mount. The article was titled Sony Alpha (Minolta Maxxum  mount) lens bargains.
I also wrote  a review of my main wide-angle lens, the Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM. And  predictably review was titled Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Review.
A couple  years ago I wrote an article called How Ebay profits from software piracy, based  on my experiences with one transaction. Those are the most recent articles on ... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/comments?id=42</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anthroposophy and Ecofascism 26</title>
      <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/archive/41.html</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:45:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Turning now to paragraph 8 of Peter Staudenmaier's 'Anthroposophy and Ecofascism':

   Peter Staudenmaier writes in Paragraph 8: 
   Steiner dedicated ten years of his life to the theosophical movement, becoming one of its best-known spokespeople and honing his supernatural skills. He broke from mainstream theosophy in 1913, taking most of the German-speaking sections with him, when Besant and her colleagues declared the young Krishnamurti, a boy they &amp;quot;discovered&amp;quot; in northern India, to be the reincarnation of Christ. Steiner was unwilling to accept a brown-skinned Hindu lad as... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/comments?id=41</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anthroposophy and Ecofascism 25</title>
      <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/archive/40.html</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>   Continuing my commentary on paragraph 7 of Peter Staudenmaier&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Anthroposophy and Ecofascism&amp;#39;:  Staudenmaier&amp;#39;s footnote does not actually have directly to do with the statements in this paragraph; it refers to a chapter called &quot;The Occult Origins of National Socialism&quot; in the book The Fascist Revolution: Toward a General Theory of Fascism by George Mosse. If this is as much as Staudenmaier has read on the issue of Theosophy as presented by Blavatsky (as his footnotes imply) then he is indeed woefully unprepared to discuss the subject knowledgably.  An unsubstantiated... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/comments?id=40</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anthroposophy and Ecofascism 24</title>
      <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/archive/39.html</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Turning now to paragraph 7 of Peter Staudenmaier's 'Anthroposophy and Ecofascism':



   Peter Staudenmaier writes in Paragraph 7: 


  In 1902 Steiner joined the Theosophical Society and almost immediately became General Secretary of its German section. Theosophy was a curious amalgam of esoteric precepts drawn from various traditions, above all Hinduism and Buddhism, refracted through a European occult lens. (On the connections between theosophy and the Nazis, see George Mosse, &quot;The Occult Origins of National Socialism&quot; in Mosse, The Fascist Revolution: Toward a General Theory of Fascism,... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/comments?id=39</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anthroposophy and Ecofascism 23</title>
      <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/archive/37.html</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 03:08:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <description> Continuing my examiniation of paragraphy 6 of Peter Staudenmaier's 'Anthroposophy and Ecofascism'::
Further, only one example of Steiner's flip-flopping is given, an apparent reversal on the topic of Christianity. This question has been written on at some length by a number of people, though you wouldn't know it from this piece*, and Steiner himself commented on it in his autobiography . Writing in The Course of My Life (New York 1951, page 274) he said:

  &amp;#8220;Individual assertions regarding Christianity which I wrote or uttered in lectures at this time appear to be contrary to the... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/comments?id=37</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anthroposophy and Ecofascism 22 </title>
      <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/archive/38.html</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 03:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <description> Continuing my examiniation of paragraphy 6 of Peter Staudenmaier's 'Anthroposophy and Ecofascism'::
It is stated that &amp;quot;Steiner changed his mind on many topics in the course of his career.&amp;quot; This accusation is hardly new, and Steiner repeatedly addressed it during his lifetime. Writing in, An Outline of Occult Science (Hudson 1972, p. xxxii - Preface to the First edition, translation by Maud and Henry B. Monges, and revised by Lisa D. Monges) Rudolf Steiner said:

  &amp;#8220; Many kinds of possible criticism could still be cited. There might be critics who have read the earlier... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/comments?id=38</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anthroposophy and Ecofascism 21 </title>
      <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/archive/36.html</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 03:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>  Continuing my examiniation of paragraphy 6 of Peter Staudenmaier&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Anthroposophy and Ecofascism&amp;#39;:  Staudenmaier&amp;#39;s obvious contempt for his subject is quite evident in his calling Steiner&amp;#39;s various activities before age 36 &amp;quot;dabble[ing] in a number of unusual causes.&amp;#8221; Steiner&amp;#39;s seven meticulous volumes of Goethe&amp;#39;s scientific writings completed while officially in the employ of the Goethe Archives were universally praised by the scholars of his day. On leaving the archives, he was praised with the following words: &amp;#8220;His work, which combined critical... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/comments?id=36</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anthroposophy and Ecofascism 20 </title>
      <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/archive/35.html</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <description> Continuing my examiniation of paragraphy 6 of Peter Staudenmaier's 'Anthroposophy and Ecofascism':
Steiner consistently maintained that his intellectual development was a gradual evolution. Steiner's view that his intellectual development represented a gradual evolution is demonstrated in the following:

  &amp;quot;Anyone who has found my writings and lectures may gather all this from them; and I would not especially mention this matter were it not repeatedly said in error that I have departed from all that I wrote and said formerly and turned to the views represented in the works of... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/comments?id=35</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anthroposophy and Ecofascism 19</title>
      <link>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/archive/34.html</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:39:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <description> Continuing my examiniation of paragraphy 6 of Peter Staudenmaier's 'Anthroposophy and Ecofascism':
Among the 95 works Steiner published during his time in Weimar was a book on Nietzsche, which Staudenmaier makes a great deal of later in this article. This period comprises about a quarter of Steiner&amp;#8217;s autobiography that Staudenmaier will make a big deal of in a follow-up piece. (See Rudolf Steiner, The Course of My Life, New York, 1951. Chapters X to XXIII - chapters 10 through 23 of 38 total) deal with this period &amp;#8211; pages 119 to 249 out of 358.) These were arguably very... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://hindes.blogdrive.com/comments?id=34</comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
